Critical Analysis of Two Passages of "Fiction":
Passages:
1.
Toph
and Dave discuss the “Big Day” p.114-120
‘“I mean, it was almost as if it was too
much to happen in one day, as if a number of days had been spliced together to
quickly paint a picture of an entire period of time, to create a whole-seeming
idea of how we are living, without having to stoop (or rise) to actually pacing
the story out.”
“What are you getting at?”
. . .
“So you’re reduced to complaining about
it. Or worse, doing little tricks, out of frustration.”
. . .
“The gimmicks, bells, whistles.
Diagrams. Here is a picture of a stapler, all that.”
“Right.”
“You know, to be honest, though, what I
see is less a problem with form, all that grarbage, and more a problem of
conscience. You’re completely paralyzed with guilt about relating all this in
the first place, especially the stuff earlier on. You feel somehow obligated to
do it, but you also know that Mom and Dad would hate it, would crucify you-”’
Read
until the middle of page 120 where the paragraph begins, “I leave the light on
. . .”
2.
Visit
of John in the hospital p. 271-275
“I go in to see him.
“He has a tube sticking out of his
mouth, one out of his nose. . . . It looks like his hands are tied to the bed.”
“His hands are tied to the bed. The bindings
are thick, black, Velcro. He must have resisted, or swung at someone . . .
“But this room is much too big, too big
and white. This huge room, separate from the rest of the ward, must have been
built for more than one bed. . .
“Who’s John?”
“You’re John.”
“I’m John?”
“Yeah. I changed your name.”
. . .
“. . . Whatever. But I didn’t ask
you to broadcast all this-”
. . .
“Whatever. This is mine. You’ve
given it to me. We’re trading. I gave you the attention you wanted, I bail you
out, when you spend three days in the psych ward, and say how you’re still
thinking of doing it, I’m the one who comes in and sits on your bed and gives
you the big pep talk – anyway, the point is that because of all of that, all
the shit I put in for you – now I get this, this is mine also, and you, because
you’ve done it yourself, made yourself the thespian, you have to fulfill that
contract, play the dates, go on the road. Now you’re the metaphor.”
Read
until break on p.275.
As seen in both passages, Dave Eggers
blends humorous/witty, honest/serious and exaggerated melodramatic into his repertoire
of tones. In many cases he juts these tones side by side. In both passages, he
begins and ends with a mixture of a humorous and melodramatic tone, which he
also uses to break from any serious, bluntly honest analysis of himself. In the
Toph scene, this can be seen through the conversation of the “Big Day” that
included “basketball,” “dinner,” “open house,” “ice cream” and a “movie” (114)
He continues to intersperse the humor in his use of “gimmicks, bells, whistles.
Diagrams. Here is a picture of a stapler” and the “toothpaste on your chin” (115;
117). It is almost as though he uses it
as a preface and apology for his serious tone as though he is afraid that he
will lose his audience by being too serious. In a way, it reflects this battle
of his “conscience” to stay true to the story of his life, parents, childhood,
Toph, but he still wants to entertain
his readers. As a result he maintains the humor and a fictionalized version of
events, such as the Toph conversation. It serves as his conflict, his
reflection of serious matters such as what he is thinking/feeling as he deals
with his parents’ death and raises Toph, and the needed humor.
This is also seen in his blend of
honesty and melodrama and humor in the second passage. His exaggeration of the expansive
and white hospital room and bed and the bruises on John’s arms reflect this use
of a melodramatic tone. This is combination of humor and melodrama is seen on
p. 272, “But then you’d be dying, and the last thing you would see would be
some LeRoy Neiman print from the 1983 Masters and that would be just too
terrible, not that there could ever be any appropriate thing to see before you
died – But if you really liked golf.” He continues this in his initial banter
with “John” about his fake name until it goes into a more serious tone about John
serving as a metaphor of lost youth in his book. But even then he tries to hide
this honesty of his fictionalization through a melodrama of being a good friend
and giving John morphine. So he again uses these fictionalized versions of the
truth to hint at honesty or falsehood in this book, analyze himself and others,
and still entertain his readers.
Good post, E.
ReplyDeleteI wonder, do we always need to apologize for our seriousness with humor? What other stances could Eggers have taken? What if this were a totally serious memoir about him raising his brother after their parents' death?
What pitfalls might he have encountered? In what ways would we prefer that account?
That is a really good question, and I wonder what everyone else thinks as well.
DeletePersonally, I do not think we have to apologize for our seriousness, but I think we do it to reassure the readers/concerned audience that we are human and are not completely depressed. I also think humor acts as a relief to the sadness or seriousness of a topic. I mean, my parents and I would sometimes have to laugh at small things that my grandma did, because of her dementia. It was the only way we could cope and stay normal without being sad? If that makes sense? I think in that way that is probably another reason Eggers adds the humor in his seriousness.
Eggers could have taken a completely serious outlook.Or he could have been completely melodramatic or goofy throughout the memoir. I think both would have had pitfalls. If he had been totally serious, he would always have the credibility and accountability, and his readers would be able to belief him at his word throughout the story. They would not question his fictionalizing parts of the story. But at the same time, it could end up being more boring? Having the story completely serious could possibly slow down the pace of the book, because it would just be so heavy.
On the other hand, a light-hearted piece could seem fake and not as meaningful.
So I guess maybe this balance affords both entertainment, light-heartedness and some credibility in his seriousness?
I think the two passages you chose do a nice job at contrasting each other's tones. I love his dialogue with Toph in the first passage because he makes Toph out to be serious and keeps himself as a silly care-free character when in reality a little kid would never be lecturing him the way he presents the conversation. I totally agree with idea that Eggers is afraid that if he loses his humor, he will lose his audience. I think it would be nice to see him lighten up on the amount of humor used a couple times throughout the book but I do find his jokes to make the reading more interesting. What do you think?? Lighten up on the humor and show the reader a more serious side or keep it the same?
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that he should lighten up on his humor in some places, but I guess it is a tricky balance. Either extreme would be bad, but a balance sometimes seems contradictory.
DeleteI think if he didn't use the same technique of mixing both tones and did do a couple of scenes that were completely serious, I think that would be better. He would still have his jokes to entertain his readers and not lose his audience, but he would be mixing up the constant routine of serious, humor, serious scene. Do you agree or what do you think?